Berkshire Concrete Sues Dalton

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass.— Berkshire Concrete is taking the town to court over the Planning Board's decision to deny its special permit. 
 
"As of this evening, around 4 p.m., we were served by the law firm representing BCC related to the [Planning Board's] decision," Town Manager Eric Anderson told the Select Board on Monday. 
 
"We haven't even opened it, so we are getting sued by BCC over the Planning Board's decision. So, I'm sure that'll be in the court system for the next three to five years."
 
At the time of writing this, the case has not been posted on the state website. 
 
In March, the Planning Board voted to deny Berkshire Concrete's special permit after five meetings. 
 
The decisions stemmed from recurring concerns raised in previous meetings: the company's lack of clear mitigation plans and ambiguous documentation outlining its work plans.
 
Additionally, Berkshire Concrete's public hearing to appeal its $10,000 fine, that was set for Tuesday April 14, has been rescheduled. 
 
At the time of publishing, the item is still on the agenda and the Board of Health is still meeting on Tuesday.
 
The board may decide to table the item because it was said during Monday's Select Board meeting that the hearing has been pushed to April 28 as their lawyer can't make it.
 
"It seems another delayed tactic," Clean Air Committee member Richard Hall told the Select Board when informing them of the change.  
 
The board attempted to fine Berkshire Concrete on March 2, issuing a $5,000 fine for creating a public nuisance by allowing sand and dust to leave the property and for failing to submit an adequate dust mitigation plan despite numerous orders
 
This fine went unpaid and was not appealed. However, Berkshire Concrete did appeal the subsequent fine of $10,000. 
 
The reported violation of dust in the community opens Berkshire Concrete up to additional fines. They can theoretically be fined up to $10,000 a day for repeated violations, Town Manager Eric Anderson previously said. 
 
The neighbors of Berkshire Concrete have been working to combat the sand from leaving the site for over a year and since then have successfully had the town install air monitors which recently showed data that was off the charts.
 
During the public comment period, Hall quoted the appeal from Berkshire Concrete, a subsidiary of Petricca Industries, saying that the Board of Health did not "establish the existence of a nuisance through objective evidence." 
 
He also shared an April 6 correspondence between Petricca Industries' attorney Dennis Egan Jr. of Cohen Kinne Valicenti & Cook LLP, and Brian Duval, the zoning enforcement officer. 
 
"In fact, your email below is the first time any Dalton town official has suggested that the reclamation undertaken in 2025 was not satisfactory and there has been no objective evidence to date to support such a position," Hall quoted Egan writing in the email. 
 
Hall questioned these assertions because the enforcement order dated Oct. 15, 2025, does just that. 
 
 
This surmise proved to be true as Berkshire Concrete applied for a special permit to continue excavation in that area. This permit was denied but Berkshire Concrete can reapply before its current permit expires in December 2027.
 
According to the current permit, earth removal, such as excavation, processing, and reclamation is allowed on lots 217-3 and 106-55.1, but is subject to several conditions set forth in 1992, 1994, and 2000. 
 
Conditions include hours of operations, traffic regulations, restoration requirements, and other stipulations. 
 
 
Berkshire Concrete attempted to appeal this but the board maintained the decision and ordered that the digsite be fully remediated or covered to abide by town bylaws. To date, the digsite is still not fully remediated. 

Tags: berkshire concrete,   lawsuit,   permitting,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield: Should Park Square Be an Historic District?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The committee drafting a proposed local historic district around Park Square wants to generate interest and participation in the process. 

Members launched the charge during meetings in August and September. A survey and public hearing are planned to gather feedback early on. 

City Planner Kevin Rayner explained they are not just doing this out of a love for historic buildings, but for the timeless sense of place you get when you step into Park Square, which was laid out over 200 years ago and hosted the first-ever agricultural fair in 1810. 

"I think that the main thing that we need to kind of park on is that this is the heart of our community, and it really sets the stage for the sense of place in Pittsfield, and any change to that should have some review and some consensus from folks who have a passion for protecting the history and that character of Pittsfield," he said to the new Local Historic District Study Committee last week. 

"And there's that private property versus historic resource thing, but I’d say that a lot of these buildings on the square belong to the soul of Pittsfield here, and deserve to be protected, and I don't think that the layer of regulation that we're throwing down here is going to be unreasonable or a real boundary." 

In March, the City Council voted to amend the City Code, Chapter 2, to establish the study committee.

Pittsfield has more than 20 locations on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Park Square Historical District, but the designation just allows communities to apply for federal tax credits and doesn't impose restrictions on buildings. The central area was laid out a few decades after Pittsfield was given a town charter in 1761.

A district can be one building, several buildings, or an area. Historic restrictions only apply to the exterior of buildings; the committee has authority to say a building in the district cannot be demolished. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories